Healthcare Giants and Consumers Are Both Victims When It Comes To Security Violations

by

When Electronic Health Records were first installed into hospitals and networks, it was seen as a great innovation. However, an important step in their implementation was glazed over: ensuring their security. According to Politico, hacks related to security lapses have cost the healthcare industry around $6 billion a year.

In cyber-insurance, where the market is growing around 20-25% per year, why are these security issues not being addressed? Some of the nation's biggest healthcare providers have already suffered data breaches: Anthem, Premera, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, and CommunityHealth Systems.  Together, they account for the health records of about 95 million Americans. The high cost of these hacks also weighs heavily on the consumer: if you are one of the 95 million who has had their records stolen, it can result in identity or financial theft, along with thousands of dollars in legal fees needed to restore them.

So, why are the bad guys winning this battle against big health insurers? Lisa Gallagher, a cyber-security expert at the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, said that 10% of Information Technology budgets in healthcare should be spent on security (with that number shooting up to 40% if the company has just started using electronic health records, according to Michael Garvin at Symantec) – yet the industry average hovers at around only 3% of their budgets.

This gap presents a huge problem - not only are consumers at risk of having their information stolen, but the very insurers being hacked are at risk of losing business because of it. On Capitol Hill, there has been a rallying cry to address cyber-security threats – but legislation does not resolve the issue when insurers either can’t or won’t spend more on beefing up security.

It’s clear that prioritizing security must be at the forefront of the agenda for the healthcare industry. Identifying possible vulnerabilities and building an infrastructure to deal with the evolving threat of hackers is necessary – but this requires attention to and visibility into your systems. Security and innovation must go hand in hand, or else you risk a situation where billions may be spent to improve services and increase revenue, and then promptly lost because they were built improperly.

On both the consumer and industry side, it is a lose-lose situation. It may be time to change that dynamic.

To read the full article on Healthcare record security visit here.

Get the Pulse Newsletter  Sign up for the latest Software Intelligence news Subscribe Now <>
Open source is part of almost every software capability we use today. At the  very least libraries, frameworks or databases that get used in mission critical  IT systems. In some cases entire systems being build on top of open source  foundations. Since we have been benchmarking IT software for years, we thought  we would set our sights on some of the most commonly used open source software  (OSS) projects. Software Intelligence Report <> Papers
In our 29-criteria evaluation of the static application security testing (SAST)  market, we identified the 10 most significant vendors — CAST, CA Veracode,  Checkmarx, IBM, Micro Focus, Parasoft, Rogue Wave Software, SiteLock,  SonarSource, and Synopsys — and researched, analyzed, and scored them. This  report shows how each measures up and helps security professionals make the  right choice. Forrester Wave: Static Application Security Testing, Q4 2017  Analyst Paper
This study by CAST reveals potential reasons for poor software quality that  puts businesses at risk, including clashes with management and little  understanding of system architecture. What Motivates Today’s Top Performing  Developers Survey
Frances Lash
Frances Lash Digital Marketing Manager at ROOT Data Center
Strong sales and marketing professional with a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) focused in Political Science and double minor in Marketing and English (Cultural Studies) from McGill University.
Load more reviews
Thank you for the review! Your review must be approved first
Rating
New code

You've already submitted a review for this item

|