Gartner-CAST Whitepaper: Monetize Technical Debt

by

Last fall, Gartner VP and Fellow Andy Kyte brought significant illumination to a long-known fact in the technology industry – that billions of dollars were being spent on Technical Debt - the cost of fixing the structural quality problems in an application that, if left unchanged, are highly likely to cause major disruption and put the business at serious risk.  Kyte said that Technical Debt has exploded in recent years; he set the current value of Technical Debt at approximately a $500 Billion globally and said it was quickly escalating to the $1 Trillion mark by 2015.

Around the time Kyte was announcing his results, we at CAST were announcing the results of our own Worldwide Application Software Quality Study, in which we assessed 288 IT applications from 75 companies throughout a variety of industries and comprising a total of 108 million lines of code. Using a very, almost overly conservative estimate of the maintenance cost per line of code to fix the problems uncovered, we determined that the average company was spending in excess of $1 Million on Application Technical Debt.

In order to evangelize the problem and assist IT departments in making a case to support improving processes, platforms and personnel en route to improving the structural quality of software, CAST has joined forces with Kyte to produce a whitepaper titled, “How to Monetize Application Technical Debt: A Data-Driven Approach to Balance Delivery Agility with Business Risk.”

The research paper illustrates how to calculate technical debt and then set and monitor the right quality threshold for balancing delivery agility with the risk of business disruption. In addition, the paper includes the research report, “Measure and Manage Your IT Debt,” by Kyte, who explains the systemic risk in the application portfolio caused by the accumulation of Technical Debt over the last decade.

The full research paper, including excerpts from “Measure and Manage Your IT Debt,” is available from CAST here.

Filed in: CAST News
Get the Pulse Newsletter  Sign up for the latest Software Intelligence news Subscribe Now <>
Open source is part of almost every software capability we use today. At the  very least libraries, frameworks or databases that get used in mission critical  IT systems. In some cases entire systems being build on top of open source  foundations. Since we have been benchmarking IT software for years, we thought  we would set our sights on some of the most commonly used open source software  (OSS) projects. Software Intelligence Report <> Papers
In our 29-criteria evaluation of the static application security testing (SAST)  market, we identified the 10 most significant vendors — CAST, CA Veracode,  Checkmarx, IBM, Micro Focus, Parasoft, Rogue Wave Software, SiteLock,  SonarSource, and Synopsys — and researched, analyzed, and scored them. This  report shows how each measures up and helps security professionals make the  right choice. Forrester Wave: Static Application Security Testing, Q4 2017  Analyst Paper
This study by CAST reveals potential reasons for poor software quality that  puts businesses at risk, including clashes with management and little  understanding of system architecture. What Motivates Today’s Top Performing  Developers Survey
Jonathan Bloom Writer, Blogger & PR Consultant
Jonathan is an experienced writer with over 20 years writing about the Technology industry. Jon has written more than 750 journal and magazine articles, blogs and other materials that have been published throughout the U.S. and Canada. He has expertise in a wide range of subjects within the IT industry including software development, enterprise software, mobile, database, security, BI, SaaS/Cloud, Health Care IT and Sustainable Technology. In his free time, Jon enjoys attending sporting events, cooking, studying American history and listening to Bruce Springsteen music.
Load more reviews
Thank you for the review! Your review must be approved first
Rating
New code

You've already submitted a review for this item

|